Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

1. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) provided that the means of access used for electronic financial transactions may not be transferred or taken over, except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts; (b) provided that at a high-speed bus terminal located in Geum-gu, Busan, Nowon-gu, 133, the Defendant transferred the means of access used in the electronic financial transactions in the name of the Defendant, using the high-speed terminal website as a part of the Defendant’s bank account (C), one bank account (D), and one check card, each connected to the Busan bank account, and one check to be used in the electronic financial transactions in the name of the Defendant, respectively.

2. According to the records, the Defendant, on May 11, 2015, issued a summary order of a fine of two million won on the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by Jeju District Court Decision, and confirmed on June 4, 2015, the above summary order was issued. The facts of the crime are clear that the Defendant is a clerical error in the “D” in light of the interrogation protocol of a suspect in the relevant case and the description of a copy of one bank account in the name of the Defendant in light of each of the following: (a) Han Bank Account (D) No. 2015Da2428 against the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in the Busan Mapo-dong, Busan Mapo-dong around September 2014 at the Busan Mapo-dong.

The head of the Tong and the eck card, etc. connected to the head of the Tong and the eck card, etc. were transferred to the person who was named in the name, and the defendant can recognize the fact that the head of the Tong and the eck card connected to the Busan Bank Account, as stated in the facts charged, are transferred to the above person who was named in the name

According to the above facts, the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, for which a summary order has become final and conclusive, and the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, which has been indicted for the instant case, is committed by transferring several means of access in a lump sum, and there is a commercial concurrence under Article 40 of the Criminal Act, and Supreme Court Order March 25, 2010.