The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal lies in the fact that the Defendant was punished for trial expenses surrounding the problem of driving the victim and the vehicle on the day of the instant case, but at the time, the victim walked with the Defendant, and the Defendant was in line with the victim, and the flat was in line with the flat of flat of the victim, and the Defendant did not inflict bodily injury on the victim by taking the face of the victim with his head. However, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it is just that the court below found the defendant guilty of the above facts of the crime since it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant suffered from the victim's face with head at the time, and caused the victim's bodily injury to the upper thromatic and thirical mar, and it is reasonable that the court below found the defendant guilty of the above facts of crime, and there is no error of law of misunderstanding as alleged by the defendant.

① From the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the victim stated that “A taxi was driven in front of the subway station No. 10 in the subway station No. 12:00 on February 10, 2015, the subway station No. 10 on the day of the crime in Busan Dong-dong, Busan, and the taxi driven by the Defendant was placed in the front of the victim’s own vehicle, and both the Defendant and the victim were equipped with the vehicle near the victim, and the Defendant was able to have the victim knife with the victim’s hand, thereby preventing the Defendant, by putting the victim’s face on his hand, and the Defendant was faced with the victim’s face from the victim’s upper part.” At the time of the instant case, the victim stated consistently and specifically in detail as to the background of the assault from the Defendant at the time of the instant case.

② The victim reported 11:56 on the day of the instant case by using his portable phone, and requested a police officer to move out to the police officer, when he reported 112.