1. Defendant A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, Defendant D and Defendant E, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act and the judgment on October 3, 2015 became final and conclusive on September 3, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Each gambling Defendants A, B, C, Defendant D, and Defendant E’s each gambling Defendants: (a) from August 28, 2014 to early December 2, 2014, from around the first day of the same year, each of the instant F office was divided into seven by using the card 52; (b) several times, and (c) a person who has less than the highest score in line with the pattern and number; and (d) a person who has less than the lowest score in consecutive order from those with less than the card 52; and (c) a person who received four copies of betting through card 52 and carried out a betting amount on several occasions; and (d) a person who was less than the number was different from the pattern of betting in the last four card in each of the last four cards without restriction.

As a result, the above Defendants committed gambling.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 475"

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part of the legal statement of the accused G and H;

1. Data on the details of gambling, gambling and gambling;

1. A report on internal investigation (the date and time of gambling for suspects D);

1. Before and after the judgment (defendant A), criminal records, investigation reports (report attached to criminal records, criminal suspects I, A, and J ex post concurrent crimes), and the application of a copy of each statute of the judgment;

1. Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 246 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of punishment (the defendants);

1. Handling concurrent crimes (Defendant A) (latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act include each of the Defendants’ criminal records of the same and similar crimes, and the frequency and scale of the crime of gambling as well as each of the above Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, and crime.