All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The Defendants are the same as Dong-dong residents and have civil relations.

A. On December 14, 2015, Defendant B demanded that Defendant B pay KRW 1 million in the first floor of the apartment house located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Mapo-gu) from the first floor of the apartment house in Mapo-gu (hereinafter “Seoul Mapo-gu”) to Defendant B promptly repay the amount of KRW 1 million, which Defendant A lent to oneself, Defendant B left in his head and her head three times.

Accordingly, Defendant B assaulted Defendant A.

B. Defendant A demanded that Defendant A promptly repay 1 million won of the money lent to Defendant B at the same time and place as that set forth in the preceding paragraph, and Defendant A her french was slicked, and Defendant A her bucked at one time with his french.

Accordingly, Defendant A assaulted Defendant B.

2. The facts charged of the instant case cannot be prosecuted against the express intent of the victims under Article 260(3) of the Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that the victims and the defendants in the status of the defendant have withdrawn their wish to punish each other.

Therefore, all of the public prosecutions of this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.