The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant has not delivered the victim's chest.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The defendant asserts that, although there is a fact that the Chinese mother who was seated in the front seat of the bus would be boomed, it does not constitute an indecent act.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, such as CCTV images (USB camera), which are lawfully adopted and investigated by the evidence, are ① the mother of the victim and the victim, and the victim were sitting at the seat next to that, and the victim was sitting at the back of the victim's day. ② The defendant stated in his statement that he was able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to the victim. However, on the screen of the video, it is not clear whether the defendant was able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to by the victim.