logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.22 2019가단560374
사해행위취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From August 8, 2001 to April 5, 2007, Nonparty B operated “C” under the trade name of “C,” and operated “D” from October 10 to June 30, 206.

B. B did not pay the comprehensive income tax after filing a return, or did not pay the comprehensive income tax notified by the tax office on the grounds of omission of amount of income, processing cost, error in return, etc. in operating each of the above businesses.

The specific arrears of national taxes in B shall be as follows:

(Amount in arrears is as of the filing date of the tax; 2. Tax amount (unit) notified as of 3.4 years of 2.3 years of 2.4 years of 1:0,520, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240; 3.4 years of 2.4 years of 2.4 years of 2.3 years of 20.4 years of 2.4 years of 2.3 years of 20, 305 of global income; 3.4 years of 2.4 years of 2.4 years of 2.4 years of 2.3 years of 20, 305, 306 of global income; 3.4 years of 2.4 years of 2.4 years of 3 years of 20, 205; 3.6.4 years of 3 years of 20, 206

C. The deceased on March 30, 2016, as referred by B, died, and the inheritor is the wife, Defendant F, B, and G.

On March 20, 2016, the above inheritors with respect to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet among the inherited property left by the deceased (hereinafter referred to as the “real estate of this case”) on March 20, 2016, upon the Defendant’s sole succession to the agreement on the division of inherited property, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 24, 2016.

At the time of the consultation on the division of inherited property B, there were more small assets than active assets.

[Evidence: Evidence No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (including paper numbers), all purport of oral argument]

2. Determination

(a) the nature of the fraudulent act;

arrow