The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, did not interfere with the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer, and thereby, found otherwise guilty, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below's judgment, the defendant interfered with bus operation by using the city expenses with F, which is a village bus driver, due to the problem of village bus charges, and F, upon reporting 112, sent to the scene by police officers D and E, and let him go to the village bus, and the defendant continued to go to go to F, even after the village bus was lowered, and the police officers D interfered with the police officers' legitimate execution of their duties. Thus, the charges of this case can be fully found guilty.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.