logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2012.12.26 2012고단4405
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On October 27, 1994, around 08:20 of the facts charged, the Defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management authority by loading and operating the freight exceeding the limitation weight of the freight vehicle owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s business on the 1020-line road of the Cheongju-ri, Cheongju-ri, Cheongju-ri, Cheongju-ri, Cheongju-ri, Cheong

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case, provides that "where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation." The Constitutional Court Decision 201Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 201, which is retroactively invalidated by the decision of unconstitutionality as of December 29, 201.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime and thus not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow