logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.12.21 2016고단1273
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, from January 1, 2015, was requested to submit meeting minutes attached to the resident’s written consent on the decision of the business contents of the relevant private document, to a person who had worked as the head of the C Village from March 1, 2015, and a person who had worked as the head of the C Village around March 2015 as part of the project for the special accounts for environmental improvement and the regional development in March 2015.

The Defendant received the above subsidies from Suwon-si and implemented a small river maintenance project between the first half and the second half of the village. At the time, the above village residents had conflicting opinions among village residents due to the establishment of transmission towers, and in determining the contents of the above resident support project, it was anticipated that the residents of the village would oppose the contents of the above resident support project. As the meeting minutes of the above village and the written consent of the residents were forged to be submitted at the time of development.

On March 14, 2015, the Defendant held a village council and exchanged mutual opinions on the business contents of the above community support project to residents, and finally prepared and printed out a summary of the minutes of the above village by computer as if he/she decided on the project contents of the above small river improvement project, and made it possible for the Defendant to propose three support projects in a mid- to long-term manner. Although the entire community was underdeveloped, the maintenance of the community center that was raised as a village accommodation project should be urgently resolved not only in the protection of food sources, but also in the environmental aesthetic issues, and I agree with the above projects and the above projects.

arrow