beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. At around 13:00 on August 16, 1950, during the Korean War of the North Korea, at the 13:00 North Korea War, the aircraft opened a public auction of the 7th flag force unit (CTF-77) of the Philippines CV47-11 (CVG-11) of the MVPine Sa CV47 (CVG-1) under the 7th flag force unit (CTF-7), which directed the 7th flag force of the North Korea-Gu North Korea-Eup/Myeon-dong (hereinafter referred to as the “North Korea-ri") to the North Korea-ri village at the port of Pohang-gu, North Korea (hereinafter referred to as the “North Korea-ri”), and 10 minutes of the width of aircraft, such as the NAP coal and 30 minutes of the width between the neighboring residents.
As a result, 53 North-ri residents and 53 refugees were sacrificed.
(hereinafter referred to as "North Korea Triopportun case"). (b)
1) The decision of the past history committee of the plaintiff A and 31 persons, including the plaintiff, etc., shall be made by the past history planning committee for the settlement of truth on October 25, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the "Jari History Committee").
(2) On November 1, 2010, the former History Committee filed an objection against the foregoing decision with the former History Committee on the ground that the network N,O, P, Q, and R, one of their family members, died due to the North breadth, and that the former History Committee applied for the identification of the truth of the instant case and the decision on the victim. On June 30, 2010, the former History Committee rendered a decision on the “Unwritten truth-finding” was unable to obtain and analyze the records of the instant case. (2) On December 28, 2010, the former History Committee filed an objection against the past History Committee on the ground that the instant case violates the principle of proportionality and the principles of international humanitarian law, thereby making a decision on the correction of the decision that confirmed that the instant case was a sacrifice for the victims, etc.
C. The relationship between the plaintiffs' family relationship victims
1. Category A N N P-type Q-type R
2. B SMos;
3. C mother;
4. D Lighting;
5. E-Ma
6. Flaps;
7. G T height;
8. H height;
9. On October 10, J 10 J 11. K Mamomomo 12. Lhomomo 13. The family relationship between the plaintiffs of Mhomomomomo 13 and the victims of this case is as follows.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5, 9 to 17 (including each number),