Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 6,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:40 on January 2, 2015, Defendant A: (a) drinked alcoholic beverages from “D” located in North Korea-gu, North Korea-si, North Korea-si, and brought a disturbance, such as booming, and went beyond the floor, and (b) caused a shouldered softener’s injury.

Around that time, two police officers, such as assistant F, and fire fighters, who are 119 first aid workers of the coast guard station and reported 112, were called out.

The defendant tried to return the defendant to the hospital, and the defendant was forced to take a scam from scam F by leaving scam to the hospital.

The Defendant, who was charged with the Defendant, was frightened to the police uniform F of the slope F, and was frightened to drinking a slope F, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of reported cases, public peace, and maintenance of order by driving the chest F on one occasion.

2. Defendant B, at the date, time, and place described in paragraph (1), and at the above time, the Defendant assaulted a police officer, as seen in the above, and expressed the defective slope F, who sought a slope F to arrest A as a flagrant offender committing an obstruction of performance of official duties, to “spaws, why is, or why is,?” and thereby, obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime in question;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. A crime is a bad in light of the fact that a police officer, who is performing official duties for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, uses violence while taking a bath to a police officer for the sentencing of Article 334(1).

However, in the case of Defendant B, the extent of assault is relatively minor, the Defendants seem to have committed the instant crime in a contingency under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendants were the police officers who suffered from the injury in a manner contrary to the mistake.