logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.01.21 2014고단4155
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by eight months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 25, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act; on May 20, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million to a fine of KRW 1.5 million to the same crime; on November 19, 2010, the same court notified each of the summary order of KRW 2.5 million to the same crime; on April 23, 2012, the Defendant was a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by being sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million to a fine for the same crime; on October 14, 2014, the Defendant was a person who had been driving at least two times in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act; around 00:00, a person who had been driving at least 1.5 percent of alcohol concentration in the section from the Gwangju Regional Police Agency located in Gwangju-gu Gwangju Metropolitan City to the front road located in the same Gu B.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of the said car. While driving the said car at the time specified in the foregoing paragraph 1, the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and checking the degree of damage, by driving the said car at the time specified in the foregoing paragraph 1, on the right side of the victim E-owned width, which was stopped adjacent to the front side of the said car, and driving the said car at the right side of the said vehicle on the right side of the front-hand part of the said vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the police statement of E;

1. Descriptions of a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Entry of a traffic accident report;

1. A statement in a written estimate;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: The defendant alleged that he caused the instant accident while trying to make a U-turn, and that he immediately stopped and immediately delivered his name to the victim, and that he took necessary measures after the damage of property. However, the location where the defendant paid the accident is the center line of yellow solid lines, but the U-turns are not allowed.

arrow