beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 46,233,602 to Plaintiff A; KRW 2,500,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 2,50,000 to Plaintiff C and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) The defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of fisheries, etc., and is a high-sea fishing E (hereinafter “instant vessel”).
) The head of the agency is the user of F, the Plaintiff A is the engine member of the above fishing vessel, and the Plaintiff B and C are the children of Plaintiff A. 2) on May 30, 2013, F operated on May 10, 2013 at the sea of approximately 10 miles in the north-dong of the Han-do Forest Port in Jeju-do, the north-do, and controlled the fruit of the instant vessel while operating a crick (cricks used in both networks and rearrangement operations) on decks of the instant vessel, and the Plaintiff A operated an operation to separate fixed crick blocks installed on the crick from the fixed cricks (a machine drawing up its water: a machine drawing up its water) to connect it to the brick line fixed at the lower part of the crick.
However, the F did not confirm that the Plaintiff A knife and connects over, without confirming that the Plaintiff A knife knife knife knife knife knife at a rapid speed, and the Plaintiff’s knife knife knife knife between the nife and the nife knife knife. As a result, the Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as the right side 1,2 balance cut, 3 balance nife knife knife
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). 【The ground for recognition” has no dispute, Gap’s evidence 1, 5 through 8, 16, Gap’s evidence 17-1, 2, Eul’s evidence 1, Eul’s evidence 7-2, 7, 8, Eul’s evidence 9-1, 9-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
B. Determination A.
According to the facts found in the above paragraph, F neglected the duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the server by closely examining the Plaintiff A’s progress of connecting work, the state of overwork, etc., while the instant accident occurred due to the F’s occupational negligence, as the Defendant is an employer of F pursuant to Article 756 of the Civil Act.