logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.05.19 2016고정479
청소년보호법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a foreigner of Chinese nationality, who works as an employee in the "C" restaurant in Ansan-si, a member B.

1. No person who violates the Juvenile Protection Act shall sell drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles;

Nevertheless, at around 04:30 on November 1, 2015, the Defendant sold at KRW 5,000 2 Byung-ju (I), a juvenile harmful to juveniles, to d (E), F (G) and H (I) in the above restaurant.

2. If a foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act intends to find a job in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment;

Defendant

A, despite the absence of the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities in the status of short-term stay (C-3) that entered the Republic of Korea, even from July 13, 2015 to November 1, 2015, received KRW 1,900,000 as monthly salary from the above restaurant, and worked as an employee, and performed job-seeking activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of J, D, F, and H;

1. A report on the control of a business place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control field photographs;

1. Article 59 Subparag. 6 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 28 Subparag. 1 of the former Juvenile Protection Act (Amended by Act No. 13726, Jan. 6, 2016); Article 94 Subparag. 8 of the Immigration Control Act; Article 18(1) of the Immigration Control Act (which means the sale of drugs harmful to juveniles) and Article 18(1) of the same Act (which means the employment of juveniles without obtaining the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities); and the choice of fines, respectively.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow