beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 33,00,000 to Plaintiff A; KRW 10,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and each of them, from December 17, 2014 to October 2019.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 17, 2014, the Defendant, at around 15:00, performed the work of loading a f25 tons car truck owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff truck of this case”) by using the Defendant’s excavation search machine (hereinafter “instant excavation search machine”) with a height of 1m, about 10 km of weight, and about 10 km of weight, without obtaining the Defendant’s construction operator’s license from “E” located in Kimhae-si, which he operated.
B. At the time, Plaintiff A: (a) designated a place where the Defendant would load the sprinks posted on the sprink of the Plaintiff truck of this case on the sprink; and (b) was engaged in the work of cutting the sprinks and the sprinks connected to the sprinks; (c) was shocked on the sprinks posted on the sprinks that the Defendant loaded on the sprinks to load.
(hereinafter “instant accident”).
C. The Plaintiff A suffered injury, due to the instant accident, to the extent that the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as a fluencing fluorous fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluoral, the 11st plelelele,
C. On January 14, 2015, the date of the instant accident, Plaintiff B’s wife, and on behalf of Plaintiff A, drafted a written agreement with Defendant on behalf of Plaintiff A with the following content (hereinafter “instant agreement”).
The defendant, at around 15:00 on December 17, 2014, agreed that the plaintiff A's multi-child accident is smoothly compromiseed by both parties, depending on whether the plaintiff A was in the upper end of the E company's branch located in Kim Jong-si D at around 15:0 on December 17, 2014.
After this Agreement, it is agreed that no civil or criminal objection shall be raised. Terms of agreement: 15,00,000 won shall be paid to the plaintiff A as consolation money.
Insurance management shall be dealt with by the defendant.
This agreement is irrelevant to the payment of insurance, and the defendant pays the plaintiff A as consolation money, so it is not related to the insurance company. D.
However, the plaintiff.