Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On September 12, 1992, the Defendant’s husband, prepared a receipt on September 12, 1992 stating that “The name of the administrative district was changed to “after the time of the preparation of the receipt,” the 400 square meters of the answer located in Gyeonggi-do Seosung-gun (hereinafter “D”) D (hereinafter “the land located in D”) was agreed between the obligee (the Plaintiff) and the obligor (the Plaintiff) in the form of trade, and the buyer (the buyer) paid the full amount to the seller (the net C) at the same time, and the seller received the full amount.” The Defendant signed and sealed the receipt as the guarantor (hereinafter “instant receipt”).
B. The land purchase network C in the Siljin-si purchased the land located in the Sil Jin-si (the name of the administrative district was changed to the Sil Jin-gun at the time of purchase, but thereafter, it was changed to the Sil Jin-gun), and completed the registration of ownership transfer by adding it to the following table:
The area of the land category of E in the address No. 3,073, Oct. 31, 1997, when the cause of registration is 1,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 on Sept. 26, 1997; and
C. The deceased C’s death and inheritance network C died on November 19, 2010, and the Defendant, the wife of the deceased C, succeeded to the entire land of this case by agreement division.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's evidence 1-1, 2, 3, and Gap's evidence 3-8, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments
2. Judgment as to the primary cause of claim
A. 1) On September 12, 1992, the plaintiff's assertion 1) on the ground of the claim 6.0/876 shares in D's land from the deceased C, the husband of the defendant, her husband, 6.