A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 1, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol by 22:16, the Defendant was driving a special injury or a violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., an accident) on a road at a point of 100 meters away from the corner of the public health clinic in Jeju City, which is located at 245 percent a year in the influence of alcohol by 0.135 percent (i.e., alcohol concentration in blood), and (ii) on a road at a point of 100 meters away from the corner of the departure distance of the public health clinic in Jeju City, along with a three-lane distance from the boundary of the gas station in Do.

In such cases, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as taking the right on the front side well and maintaining an appropriate interval with

Nevertheless, the defendant was driven by the victim D(54 tax) in front of the defendant's proceeding direction by negligence while under the influence of alcohol as above.

E Lastynasi’s back part was received as the front part of the said car.

Since then, the Defendant immediately stopped and did not take a measure after the accident, and tried to leave the scene of the accident by driving the said rocketing car, and the victim D prevented the Defendant from proceeding in front of the said rocketing car driven by the Defendant.

However, the Defendant continued to operate the said rocketing car to the victim, and the victim was slicked to the front of the said car in order to avoid this threat.

Defendant continued to leave the scene of the accident by running at a rapid speed the said dangerous object, which is a dangerous object, even after being exposed to the victim on the sar of the said rocketing and other vehicles. During that process, the Defendant continued to proceed in front of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding.

F Ethmp vehicle's back part of the FM car conflict with the front part of the FMM car's front part of the FM car, and the shock caused the damage to the victim D to fall on the road.

Accordingly, the Defendant is responsible for the repair cost of the 791,195 won, such as the exchange of back cabs owned by the victim of the traffic in South and North Korea, by such occupational negligence.