A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant lives together with C, the Gu-Si building 306.

C around April 24, 2017, around 21:30, the Gu-U.S. Police Station F Security Center located in Gu-U.S., Si-si, Si-S., and the Defendant tried to gather mobile phoness from his house in his house, and reported domestic violence to the effect that “the husband is unable to get off his house at his house,” and that “the police officer is at his house at his house.”

Accordingly, around April 24, 2017, the police officer G, who belongs to the F Security Center, and the police officer of the F Security Center, tried to listen to the circumstances of the case from the defendant at the house of the defendant with the above F Security Center, and the defendant tried to listen to the circumstances of the case from the defendant, without any particular reason, by putting in transition (19.5cm in total, 19.5cm in length, 9.5cm in length, knife) dangerous articles on the floor of the chemical, which were in danger of the chemical, and threatening the above G, H, and knife the conversation with the defendant continuously, and knife the conversation with the defendant one time at the left side of the above G.

Accordingly, the Defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of G and H on-site investigations and prevention of danger in domestic violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. On-site photographs of the case;

1. Obstruction of performance of special official duties in the report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of work log and a copy of identification card);

1. Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution of public duties requires strict punishment for interference with the execution of public duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, in order to establish public authority and protect legal order, and further strict measures are required for interference with the performance of public duties, such as this case.

However, it is against the defendant's wrong recognition, the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime, and the defendant has been damaged police officers.