beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Since from 2009, the Defendant had access to the Ganland casino, and caused most of the money that had been collected during the game, and had not been repaid with money from other persons to play the game, and had not been repaid with money from other persons. Since real estate under the name of the Defendant or the Defendant was provided as collateral for bank bills, etc., the Defendant did not have the ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from other persons.
1. Around 18:00 on April 16, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the effect that “Dial pension” in the Defendant’s operation, which was operated by the Gangwon-do Party C, did not have any intent or ability to repay the amount within the agreed time limit even if he/she borrowed money from the victim B, and even if he/she intended to use the borrowed money as the proceeds of the Gangwon-do Casino Casino games, the said victim “the cost of the pension re-contract is necessary. If 10 million won is lent, she shall be repaid within two months.”
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 9.5 million won from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number E) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim and acquired it by fraud.
2. On May 17, 2010, the Defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant “G cafeteria” located in Gangnam-gun, Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, which is the “G cafeteria,” and that the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount he/she has to pay by subrogation within the agreed time limit even if he/she had the victim F subrogated to pay the loan to the Defendant H, and that the Defendant did not have any property value of the apartment under the name of the Defendant, even if he/she did not have any property value of the apartment, the Defendant would have to pay the amount within one month of the payment, instead of the loan amount of KRW 27 million with H. The Defendant would have to pay the registration right of the apartment in its name as security.”