logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.10.05 2018고정1803
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2018, at around 15:35, the Defendants: (a) and around 240 a day in front of the Incheon DD market, Defendant A made a vision on the ground that he she took a brupt of the victim E (47 years of age). During a dispute, the Defendants were in front of the 20th day of the Incheon D market, and were in front of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 2018. The Defendants were in front of the 201st day of the 1st day of the 2018.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Report on internal accidents (pacted F telephone call);

1. A report on internal investigation, analysis and photograph of symptoms;

1. Investigation report (case on the analysis ofCCTV images) and the application of CCTV image photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective selection of punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the victim of the crime of the provisional payment order confirms the leakage or the photograph of the victim who continued to satisfy with the defendant A while satisfying with the defendant A, shows an exaggerated body and listens at the end of shooting. It is confirmed that the defendant A and the victim demanded that the satfebbbbbbling of the defendant A and the victim should not be the person who was satisfy, and that the neighboring merchant would not be the person who was satisfy and satisfy.

As such, in consideration of the fact that the injured person seems to have neglected the damage by awareness of video photographing, and that the Defendants are faced with the situation of fighting, but are against the use of violence, and thereafter, are forgotten all the things, and that it does not cause any trouble with the injured person, a sentence like the order shall be imposed.

arrow