1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 2,325,480 to Plaintiff B; (b) KRW 855,030 to Plaintiff C; and (c) KRW 823,510 to Plaintiff D; and (b) respectively, to the Plaintiff D.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Business Name E-Road (section 2): The Defendant: G University, located in Daejeon-gu, to H (F section 376m, H section 340m) - The public announcement is made on February 10, 2012 - The project operator, such as the public announcement I, etc. of Daejeon Metropolitan City on February 10, 2012;

B. The Daejeon Metropolitan City Land Tribunal’s adjudication on expropriation (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) on September 30, 2014 - The target of expropriation: the Plaintiff’s share 90/155, Plaintiff C’s share 3/155, Plaintiff D’s share 32/155, and Plaintiff D share 32/155: The date of expropriation commencement: Plaintiff A39,216,000, Plaintiff B76,542,960, Plaintiff C28,065,750, Plaintiff D27,215, and 27,2705, and 2700 won, among the Daejeon-gu Daejeon District Land Tribunal’s land ownership (hereinafter “instant land”): The amount of compensation on November 4, 2014: Plaintiff B39,216,00, Plaintiff B76,542,960, Plaintiff C28, 750, Plaintiff D27,215, and the central appraisal corporation; one of the appraisal corporations;

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on January 22, 2015 (hereinafter “instant objection”) - The content of the adjudication: Dismissal of an objection - An appraisal corporation, Sam Chang Chang-si, a stock company, and a uniform appraisal corporation.

D. The court appraiser conducted a field investigation on July 10, 2015 (hereinafter “court appraiser”) with respect to the L appraiser’s office and appraiser’s M (hereinafter “court appraiser”) of this Court - The court appraiser conducted a field investigation on the instant land. The appraisal did not have any appraisal object due to the completion of removal of the obstacles, and the appraisal did not exist - The court appraiser selected the instant land as a comparative standard site with respect to the point of time revision, regional factors, and individual factors with respect to the instant land as the price of the Plaintiff B’s share 90/15 of the instant land based on the compensation example for the 981m2 in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon as the base of time revision, regional factors, and individual factors, and then determined the price of the Plaintiff B’s share 90/150 of the instant land as KRW 78,868,440, and KRW 28,920,780, Plaintiff C’s share 32/155 of the Plaintiff’s share as the base of dispute.