1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. An intervenor is a juristic person established pursuant to C Act on January 22, 1985 and engaged in the financial business using approximately ten full-time workers at Jin-si. The plaintiff is a person who was retired on March 1, 1992 while employed by the intervenor on November 20, 1989 and was employed as the head of the department.

B. On February 6, 2015, the Intervenor issued a disposition of dismissal from position or standby for six months against the Plaintiff on the ground of “an employee’s attitude of working as an employee, a very unfaithful, a violation of a duty to obey, a violation of a duty to maintain dignity, a violation of a duty to maintain dignity, a violation of confidentiality, a violation of a duty to disclose confidential information, or a violation of the Election Act (election).” On March 18, 2015, the Intervenor issued a disposition of indefinite suspension on the ground of “abrupting of documents, a violation of service regulations related to election, an insult of directors, a insult of the chief director’s instructions, a violation of orders, lack

(hereinafter referred to as “the primary disciplinary action”) in general referring to each of the above dispositions.

On May 7, 2015, the Plaintiff made a request for remedy against the primary disciplinary action to the Ginam Regional Labor Relations Commission respectively, and the Ginam Regional Labor Relations Commission ruled on May 7, 2015 as a result of the joint review of each request for remedy by the Intervenor.

[Gyeongnam 2015 father-do109, 179(combined)] D.

On July 3, 2015, the Plaintiff reinstated to the Intervenor, and on July 15, 2015, the Intervenor issued a disposition of suspension from office for six months for the Plaintiff on July 15, 2015 following the resolution of the Disciplinary Committee.

(hereinafter referred to as "the second disciplinary action") . 1. document forgery: employee D is referred to as "A or below" upon examination by the Changwon Regional Labor Relations Commission for the improper dismissal from the second position for the same reason as that for the first dismissal from position.

The reason for dismissal is not the same reason for dismissal because the document submitted to the first first trial is forged when applying for reexamination as an employee at the time of the application for reexamination as an employee at the beginning.