Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for eight months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of E Co., Ltd. who is the owner of forest land in Kimcheon-si D, and Defendant B is the representative of G in the Gu, Si, Si, Gu.

Defendant

A, on June 19, 2015, after purchasing the above forest and field and undergoing the housing site development project, demanded K to move the H 32 h Doh I, the two graves of the deceased J and the ten 10 clans of the same clans installed within forests and fields, but K did not comply with this demand, and thus, K entrusted Defendant B with the authority to open the cemetery. The Defendants conspired to the effect that he did not have the right of the relative of the grave at the office in the Dobong-si, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and submitted documents to the effect that he did not have the right of the relative of the grave and received the permission to open the grave at will

On December 8, 2016, the Defendants conspireded to bury a grave with the knowledge of the fact that K manages the said grave, and then arbitrarily buried the remains buried in the area to the Geong-gun L Park in the Geong-gun, Geong-gun, Geong-gun, Geung-gun, Geong-do.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to discover a grave.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant B by the prosecution;

1. The legal statement of K Witness;

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a certificate of all registered matters, a land register, a copy of the highest notice, a copy of the notification, a copy of the written reply, a copy of a site photograph, a certified copy of a cadastral map and a copy of an application for permission for relocation of a cemetery, a “proof of no right of relative of a grave”, a public announcement

1. Articles 160 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. The reason for recognition of conviction under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order was that the instant grave, including the parents of K in the middle class of H, was installed as a grave of H clans, which can be known.

The Defendants are against K in order to carry out the housing site development project and the manager of the instant grave.