logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.18 2015가합538880
대여금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 10, 2006, the Defendant’s purchase of officetels and promotion of the sales of officetels B and C’s officetels sales business (hereinafter “instant land”) with the recommendation of B and C, which was known through the land-person D, the Defendant: (a) on March 10, 2006, in the auction procedure for Goyang-gu Seoul District Court for Goyang-gu’s Goyang-gu Ear Branch; (b) on March 10, 200

(B)A new building on the 11st floor and on the 11st floor, with the completion of the structural construction in progress (hereinafter referred to as “instant officetel” in total before and after the completion of the construction.

(2) B and C purchased the instant land and officetels from the Defendant and tried to implement the sales business, and D were transferred from G, the owner of the instant officetel, with the cooperation of the Defendant on November 30, 2006.

3) D and H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”)

(2) On April 19, 2007, the Plaintiff and the construction cost are KRW 4.125 million; the construction period is fixed from April 20, 2007 to April 20, 2008; and the instant contract for the instant construction of officetels (hereinafter “instant first construction contract”).

(A) The contractor column of the above construction contract (Evidence 4) is written I and B as the representative director of H.

Around that time, H’s representative director was K, and the Plaintiff L filed for registration of D, I, and B as its representative director and executive officers, respectively.

(B) On May 18, 2007, the construction of the instant officetel was changed to the Plaintiff on the grounds of the report made by the Plaintiff (No. 14.), and on May 18, 2007. (B) Although the Defendant’s sale of the instant land and officetels to J and the promotion of J’s construction of officetels, B and C were unable to purchase the instant land and officetels from the Defendant and to implement the sales business as any longer due to financial difficulties, and B and C solicited J to purchase the said land and officetels and implement the sales business.

2. Accordingly, the Defendant’s instant officetel between J and J on March 21, 2008 and the 8th floor of the entire 11st floor at the time of the instant land and the instant officetel.

arrow