logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.04.09 2015고단62
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 16, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a penalty of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Chuncheon District Court on January 16, 2013, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million with the same court on August 10, 209.

1. On November 29, 2014, the Defendant was driving a B car under the influence of alcohol of 0.152% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.152% without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the 300-meter road in the Yancheon-gun of Gangwon-do to the front side of both motor vehicles located in the same Eup.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) is a person who is engaged in driving a B car.

On November 29, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on the 21:56th day of November 29, 2014, and driven the three-lane road in front of the community credit cooperatives, which are located in the center of the Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-do, in accordance with the two-lanes of the information industry and high school.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to operate the motor vehicle in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, who was parked on the right-hand side of the car owned by the injured party C while neglecting this, received the part of the pande and the pentum from the left-hand side of the car owned by the injured party C, to the front-hand part of the car of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, failed to immediately stop the vehicle and take necessary measures, even though the repair cost, such as the replacement of the following vehicles, was damaged by the Sctra, thereby destroying the motor vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report, each traffic accident situation report, each written statement, written estimate, and the main driver's statement;

arrow