Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 19:00 on January 20, 2014, Defendant A committed assault to “F” restaurant located in Busan, the Busan, on the part of the victim B (5 years of age) and the part of the victim with vision attached, in which the victim’s hair was shakend, and the victim’s head was cut, and the victim’s head was cut off by drinking. On the other hand, Defendant A committed assault to use the victim’s bat, fating the bat, going out of the said restaurant, fating the victim’s bridge, and fating the victim’s bridge, and fating the victim’s bat, etc., which requires treatment of approximately 14 weeks.

2. At around 19:00 on January 20, 2014, Defendant B assaulted the victim A (the age of 49) and the victim with vision, and spawned outside the above restaurant, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as spawn and spawn, which require treatment for approximately two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each part of the statements of the witness A, B, G, H, and I;

1. Some statements made by the prosecutor in the suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police protocol against the Defendants, H and G

1. A complaint;

1. Each copy of the medical certificate of injury, medical certificate, and opinion;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Photographs (fluor, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in cases of a certificate of hospitalization and attaching a receipt for medical expenses);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act at the detention of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Defendant A: The degree of damage caused by the instant crime is considerably significant, and the amount deposited by the Defendant for the victim cannot be deemed to have been properly recovered from damage; and other circumstances, such as the background, means, methods, and records of the instant crime, etc., which led to the instant crime, are considered. Defendant B: The degree of damage caused by the instant crime, cannot be deemed to be significant, taking into account all the circumstances into account. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds above.