The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of 8 months sentenced by the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of this case is recognized that each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant while driving a large-sized vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance and causing injury to the victims by causing a traffic accident in violation of the signal, and at the same time, the victims run away from a ppuri vehicle without taking proper measures even after destroying and damaging the damaged vehicle, and selling the said vehicle without completing the registration of transfer in the name of the defendant as long as long as the above vehicle has not been completed, the crime is inferior and the case is not weak, and the defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million at the Busan District Court on March 19, 2013 due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., the violation of the Road Traffic Act) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (i.e., the violation of the Act on March 19, 2013).

However, the defendant is detained for not less than three months in depth, the degree of injury of the victim is not significant, the victim C, the victim's camping Transport Co., Ltd. and the victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant in the course of investigation, the damaged vehicle is affiliated with the Federation of Passenger Transport Business Association of Korea, and the above federation paid medical expenses and the agreement with the victim E in the course of investigation, and the defendant paid the full amount of the above money to the victim E in the course of investigation, and the agreement with the above federation was reached, the defendant was reached in the first instance, and the defendant agreed with E in the first instance. The defendant wanted to pay the defendant's wife against the defendant, there was no record of criminal punishment other than a fine, economic difficulty, and it is necessary to support the defendant's age and environment.