logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.09.15 2017고단723
산업기술의유출방지및보호에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. That the Defendant, including his personal relationship, was a national of the Republic of India who received the degree of a chemical engineering bachelor’s degree in India from the universities located in India, and a master’s degree in environmental engineering in C in India from the universities located in India

It is the person asserting.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant operated a technology consulting company with the trade name “D” in the Republic of India prior to the first entry into the Republic of Korea, followed the technical data of companies of the Republic of Korea, such as “LNG (LNG) base design data” of “LNG (LNG) base,” and had an opportunity to find a company in the Republic of Korea, and had an access to the high level of LNG shipbuilding offshore plant technical data owned by the Korean company and had the opportunity to acquire them without permission

Thus, the Defendant is mainly using English language, and such as chemical process design, etc. was recorded.

Meanwhile, on the other hand, on the ground that there is an overseas employment experience related thereto actively, there is a career of entering the Republic of Korea for a total of six times until February 14, 2017, including the first entry into the Republic of Korea on February 7, 2014 and leaving the Republic of Korea for five times to seek technical personnel required for adequate wages.

As above, the Defendant, from February 2014 to February 2015, repeated entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea for job-seeking activities, was employed as a director in the design field to G Co., Ltd. located in Busan Island. From October 2015 to January 2016, the Defendant was employed as a design professional fishing with the company I located in Seoul H. The Defendant served as a design-related worker in G Co., Ltd and I, and the Defendant served as a design-related worker in G Co., Ltd. and ② the company contracted or subcontracted with that company.

arrow