A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 25, 2013, the Defendant was notified of a fine of KRW 700,000 as a result of the crime of interference with business in the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch on March 25, 2013 and at least

【Criminal Facts】

On April 30, 2015, from around 19:30 to 20:00 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as under the influence of alcohol, by “Dcafeteria” operated by the victim C (40 years of age) of the same day, in which the victim C (40 years of age) had a large sound to customers with a large amount of meals, obstructed their meals, and sparing children in a restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind of suspect);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the case where an agreement has been reached with the victim and the case is contradictory);

1. The sentence of the same sentence as the order shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that even though the grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. have the same record of punishment, and only a fine has been agreed upon with the victim and it was contradictoryly against the victim;