logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.04.08 2015구단19889
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is well-known.

A foreigner with the nationality of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “C-3”) entered and staying in the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) on December 25, 2013, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on January 3, 2014, prior to the expiration of the period of stay ( January 24, 2014).

B. On December 10, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be detrimental to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is favorable.

Law is strictly punished for same-sexs, and is well-known.

Same-sexs are easy to receive social discrimination and threats.

In March 2010, the Plaintiff joined the same-sex organization called SMUG (SUG) around 201, when he/she was aware that he/she was the same-sexs after he/she was aware of his/her sexual identity at the end of 201, and he/she became aware that he/she was the same-sexs.

The plaintiff was present at the regular meeting of the same-sex group, and around 201, the plaintiff participated in the demonstration to commemorate B as the case of murder that is a same-sex human rights movement occurred.

On 2012, the Plaintiff was living together in Cambodia by being same-sexd with C.

The plaintiff is U.S.

In this regard, the same-sex was able to live together with C, and was born to the Republic of Korea.

Therefore, the plaintiff is able to become a member of a specific social group, such as the same-sexs and members of the same-sexs organization when they return to Korea.

The government and local residents are likely to be detrimental to serious human rights, such as social discrimination, intimidation, arrest, piracy, terrorism, etc.

arrow