logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.06.19 2018구합85730
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts, etc.;

A. On March 1, 1997, the Plaintiff as a party, etc. was newly appointed as an assistant professor to C University Computer Engineering Division (the name was changed to the Department of Media Contents on March 1, 2013), operated by the Intervenor on March 1, 1997, and served as the associate professor on April 1, 2002, and as a professor on April 1, 2007, and D is a student who was enrolled in the Department of Media Contents and Doctor’s degree course.

B. The Plaintiff and D were present at the school conference held in Italian, 1) and D visited Italian on October 21, 2017 to attend the school conference held in Italian, with a schedule of return from the Republic of Korea on October 30, 2017. D was scheduled to make a research announcement on October 23, 2017 at the above school conference. (2) The Plaintiff and D arrived at the new school of Italian on October 22, 2017, and completed a schedule of the school conference on October 22, 2017, and thereafter, D had a dispute between the Plaintiff and D’s sexual harassment at the school of Italian.

The plaintiff left D's accommodation and returned to the plaintiff's accommodation around his own home.

3) D refers to a male-friendly E and friendly E in Korea immediately after the Plaintiff returned to the Plaintiff, who was sexual indecent act against the Plaintiff. 4) On October 23, 2017, 2017, D purchased a boarding ticket at its own expense, and used an aircraft starting from 6:0 p.m. to 10 p.m. on October 24, 2017 to 6:0 p.m. on October 25, 2017 from the perspective of Italy, D returned to the Republic of Korea (at the time of Korea, 20 p.m. 5:20 p. o. 25:0 p.m. on October 25, 2017).

C. On October 27, 2017, the Intervenor’s dismissal disposition 1D against the Plaintiff was reported to the effect that he/she was sexual harassment and sexual indecent act by the Plaintiff at C University sexual assault counseling centers.

C. Sexual assault counseling centers at C. D. immediately after the case of the plaintiff, D, and D.

arrow