logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.10 2014나106203
건물인도
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of the instant case is as follows: “Nos. 9, 2013” to “No. 13, 2013” of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Section 16 shall be deleted and section 16 shall be deleted.

The defendant is running a business at the store in this case.

Article 10 (1) 7 of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Act No. 12042, Aug. 13, 2013); Article 10 (1) 3 of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Act No. 12042, Aug. 13, 2013); Article 10 (1) 7 of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Act No. 12042, Aug. 13, 2013); Article 10 (1) 7 of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Act No. 12042, Aug. 13, 2013); Article 10 (1) 7 of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (amended by Act No. 12042, Aug. 13, 2013); Article 5, subparagraph 2, subparagraph 3, subparagraph 4, and subparagraph 5, subparagraph 3, etc. of the same Article).

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit. Since the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow