logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고단3560
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(정보통신망침해등)
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.

provided, however, that the defendant A, a.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 3560] - Defendants

1. Defendant A and Defendant B are the representatives of online advertising chain C Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is the head of the marketing team of the said company.

The Defendants made inquiries about the contents that users know at the time of determining the purchase of goods (such as sexual surgery, study study, cosmetics, etc.) of a specific advertiser in E provided through the Internet portal site “D” and registered, in the form of experience, the contents that users want to know, and registered, in advance, a specific company, service or recommendation writing on the goods that were requested by the relevant advertiser in advance, as an answer to experience, and disguised the actual consumer’s experience, the Defendants intended to engage in the “E marketing”. Defendant A instructed Defendant B to purchase an account to be used for E marketing and prepare a notice, and Defendant B purchased the said D account in accordance with the said direction, and posted this article to E on the advertisement preparation for the advertisement company that was requested by the relevant advertiser.

Defendant

B, as above, from March 11, 2016 to December 31, 2016, Defendant A purchased KRW 1,868 of the DNA F Building G Co., Ltd. at the office of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Building G Co., Ltd., and KRW 13,486,00 in total from J, a portal account producer, using H Messen Account (I).

In order to circumvent D’s interview-related policies, the foregoing D account was a fraudulent account created by repeatedly changing a large number of telephone phones numbers, changing connection IPs, and was distributed as “a day” or “E-specific ID” or “E-specific IDs” in accordance with D’s interview-related policies.

Defendant

B From March 11, 2016 to December 31, 2016, at the above office, as above.

arrow