The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (not guilty part) argues that the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, on the ground that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim jointly with C, and that the defendant recognized only the crime of injury and acquitted the defendant as to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury).

2. 직권판단 검사가 당심에서 ‘폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)’ 공소사실 중 「오른 손바닥으로 피해자의 왼쪽 얼굴을 1회 때린 후 “고발을 하려면 해봐라”고 말을 하면서 다시 발로 1회 찼다.」를 「오른 손바닥으로 피해자의 왼쪽 얼굴을 1회 때렸다.」로, ‘업무방해’ 공소사실 중 「위력으로써 약 2시간에 걸쳐」를 「위력으로써 약 1시간에 걸쳐」로 각 변경하는 내용의 공소장변경 허가신청을 하였고, 이 법원이 이를 허가함으로써 심판대상이 변경되었으므로, 원심판결은 더 이상 유지될 수 없게 되었다.

However, even if the above reasons for ex officio destruction exist, the prosecutor's assertion of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles is still subject to the judgment of this court within the scope of determining the modified facts charged.

3. Judgment on misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. The revised facts charged

1. Around 21:00 on December 31, 2013, the Defendant and the Defendant’s wife met each other with the Victim F (the age of 47) and their wife G by telephone at the home located in the Hadong-dong-gun D located in the lower-dong-gun.

At this point, the defendant is in a fluent relationship with the victim's husband and wife, E husband and wife, and H.