logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.03 2018고단2538
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal history] The Defendant is a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on September 12, 2008 by receiving a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime from the Seoul Northern District Court on March 23, 2012, and issuing a fine of KRW 1 million for the same crime from the Suwon District Court on September 12, 2008.

[Criminal facts]

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving of a passenger car with B low-priced car.

On March 21, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.072% among blood transfusions on March 21, 2018, and proceeded at a speed of about 60 km per hour according to the speed of about 60 km in front of the point where the left part of the vehicle is transferred at the time of Suwon-si, because the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.072%.

At the time, the driver was at night and at the time, and the driver was at night and at the front of the defendant's moving direction, the victim C(25 years old) driver's drash car and the victim E(29 years old) driver's drash car stopped in accordance with the new subparagraph. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing speed and operating the safety distance with the driver's vehicle at the front time, and operating the brakes properly.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of operating the operation of the operation system at the latest after the defendant's negligence while under the influence of alcohol, the latter part of the above operation vehicle was received as the front part of the vehicle in front of the vehicle and due to the shock, the latter part of the above operation vehicle was made as the front part of the above operation vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately four weeks’ medical treatment due to occupational negligence, and injury to the victim E, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment.

2...

arrow