logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.12.04 2015고단2249
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015Kadan2249] The Defendant, in around 2000, tried to obtain money from the victim by acquiring money from the victim with an opportunity to start with the victim C first and end up with his intention to marry in a tobacco-related relationship from the university’s film club activity.

On May 24, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the home of the Defendant’s home located in Yongsan-gu, Mangsan-si and 1101, stating that “If the Defendant is unable to make a marriage fund and her mother lends money to make a good investment in real estate, he/she shall return the money to the Defendant only after he/she paid a larger profit to invest in the real estate and interest.”

However, in fact, the mother of the defendant did not make an investment in real estate, and at the time, the defendant was unable to receive bank credit loans due to the absence of any particular income, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the amount of debts by using a card with an average of 4 million won per month.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the national bank account under the name of the Defendant, as the loan money, and received KRW 148,88 million in total over 14 times from that time to March 20, 2015, as shown in the list of crimes (1) in attached Form 1, from that time.

[2015 Highest 2285] Defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.

In the past, the mother of the defendant is decentralization capable of investing in real estate, is well girent in the house, has re-influent ability, and can return 10% of the earning rate by investing in real estate to the victim in the past, and the defendant received profits from the several times.

However, in fact, the parents of the defendant did not have economic ability and did not pay it, and the defendant also paid the victim the proceeds by returning the money received from the investment.

arrow