A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:30 on January 7, 2015, the Defendant called the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju Northern-gu with the Defendant’s father D having received a report from his house to the Defendant’s father, and confirmed the details of the Defendant’s report against the Defendant’s family members, and provided the victim F (the age of 42) who was the circumstances leading to the Busan Northern Police Station E zone E zone, Gwangju Northern Police Station E zone, “I kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn g

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the suppression and investigation of crime prevention and injury to the victim at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of a letter of commission of a H hospital and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she was subject to punishment for violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. in the past, such as probation, community service order, and lecture order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act, by assaulting a police officer dispatched after receiving a report of the reason for sentencing, and thereby obstructing the legitimate performance of official duties, thereby causing injury to the victimized police officer, and the defendant committed the instant crime.

However, the fact that the defendant seems to have committed a crime of this case in a contingency under the influence of alcohol, the fact that the defendant seems to have committed a crime of this case, the degree of injury of the victim, in particular, the defendant on January 29, 2015 and the same year.

2.9.