The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, the suspension of execution for two years, and the suspension of compliance driving for forty hours) that the court below rendered is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized as committing a crime, and his depth is divided.

Defendant

In addition to being insured by the Financial Cooperative, the victim does not want to punish the defendant in consultation with the victim.

After the defendant has divorced from his wife, he has been making it difficult for him to support one baby alone while driving a taxi.

However, the defendant has a record of being subject to criminal punishment on several occasions, including being punished twice by a fine due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

The instant traffic accident is likely to result from the Defendant’s negligence because the Defendant violated the duty to protect pedestrians at the crosswalk, and the victim is highly likely to suffer from an injury, such as the closure of the left-hand upper body of the mouth, which requires medical treatment for about 14 weeks.

In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings, the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.