A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2014, at around 19:15, the Defendant: (a) told the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object by spraying that “D” E (the 51-year-old-old-year-old-old-year-old-year-old-year-old-year-old-year-old-speaking-speaking-speaking-speaking-speaking-speaking-speaking-speaking-speaking-speaking-sten

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( considered as favorable circumstances among the grounds for the relevant punishment);

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the same conditions as the above) [the scope of recommendations] The mitigated area (4 to 1.2 months) of the mitigated area (4 to 1.2 months) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the sentence) [Special Mitigation] of the Punishment of Violence Crimes (the Decision on the Punishment of Sentence] is not easy in light of the contents of the Defendant's crime in 6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution, but the nature of the crime is not easy in light of the contents of the Defendant's crime. However, it is against the Defendant, and it seems that contingent agreement is reached only with the victim, etc.