The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one and half years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. It is recognized that the Defendant appears to reflect his mistake, and that the Defendant appears to have repaid a considerable amount of damages to the victim.

However, in light of the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not very good, that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, that the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case was a large amount, but did not complete recovery or agreement up to the trial. Considering the balance between the crime of this case and the sentencing of the defendant, the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.