logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.09.24 2015고단4111
절도등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. From around 2010 to 2012, the Defendant, while residing in No. 103 Dong G apartment 104, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and making a campaign by putting the stairs inside the apartment, found that the apartment resident can easily take the password of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string, and that

When the defendant plans to steals the precious metal from living expenses due to the lack of living expenses, he grasps the moving time of the apartment residents in the vicinity of the above apartment, while scaming it on the stairs of the above apartment, and stored it in his cellular phone, etc., and then steals the precious metal when there is no person in the house that is the object of damage.

On September 2014, the Defendant, at around 104 Dong 1104 and 1104 of the above apartment building, laid down a password, which the victim H had been able to take a password of the current entrance, and intruded into the above house, and then put about approximately KRW 5,00,000 and KRW 10-15,00,00 in total, such as a half-round 10,000 and half-round 10,000 in cash owned by the victim H, and stolen money and valuables.

From that point to June 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) invadedd the victim’s residence over a total of 21 occasions, and stolen money and valuables worth KRW 69,252,000 in total; and (b) attempted to steals money and valuables by intrudeing the victim’s residence over a total of two occasions, such as the table Nos. 22 and 23 in attached Table Nos. 22 and 23.

B. In around 2014, the Defendant found one resident registration certificate owned by the victim I lost at a Buddhist area, which was owned by the victim I.

The Defendant did not follow necessary procedures such as returning the goods acquired as above to the victim, and embezzled the goods that he/she had on his/her own mind and left the possession of the victim.

2. Defendant B: (a) on April 2014.

arrow