1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. 사실관계 [인정근거] 갑 1∽15호증(가지번호 포함)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지 ① 원고는 2014. 4. 21. 보성종합건설 주식회사(이하 ‘소외 회사’)와 원고가 시행하는 E공사 계약(이하 ‘이 사건 공사계약’)을 체결하였다.

② On May 13, 2014, Nonparty Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) entered into a contract for reinforced concrete and soil works, and ancillary civil construction works (hereinafter “instant subcontract”). On September 17, 2014, Nonparty Co., Ltd entered into a contract for the instant subcontract to change the construction period from May 14 to October 31, 2014.

On June 10, 2014, the Plaintiff, Nonparty Company, and Defendant Company: (a) agreed to pay the subcontract price corresponding to the part performed by Defendant Company directly to the Defendant Company; (b) drafted a “Agreement on Direct Payment of Subcontract Price” (hereinafter “Agreement on Direct Payment of Subcontract Price”) with the same content as the right.

F In addition to F’s delivery of the provisional attachment order of claim No. 2014Kadan2770 rendered on August 21, 2014 by the Suwon District Court, which was issued upon the application of F for the claim for the construction price of this case as a creditor of the non-party company, G, H, and the Defendants, as indicated in attached Table 1, are the creditors of the non-party company, the Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation was entrusted with the collection of pension insurance, fy, employment and industrial accident compensation insurance in addition to health insurance premiums pursuant to Article 88 of the National Pension Act and Article 4 of the Act on the Collection of Insurance Premiums for Employment Insurance and Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance.

Provisional attachment of claims, seizure of claims was made.

I E (comfore) The non-party company notified the Plaintiff of the fact that “the non-party company cannot complete the instant construction due to the managerial reasons of the non-party company and the hard work of the partner company” around March 4, 2015, and the Plaintiff renounced the instant construction work.” The Plaintiff was non-party on March 4, 2015.