logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.12.16 2016나33859
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. Except for an additional determination as set forth in the following (3), the corresponding part of the reasoning for the first instance judgment shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. (2) The main part of the case is as follows: (i) The non-party company is merely a capital of KRW 10 million; (ii) the non-party company is merely a nominal name; (iii) there is no employee other than the defendant; and (iv) there is no employee other than the defendant; and (v) it appears that the contract for the work unpaid by the plaintiff appears to be established for the purpose of construction due to the fact that the non-party company contracted the construction work to F, and the plaintiff agreed to work as the site manager of the non-party company at the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the same time while the plaintiff agreed to work as the site manager of the non-party company; and (iv) the plaintiff did not clearly have been aware of the defendant as a contracting party, who is the supervisor of the non-party company, and then again filed a lawsuit for the construction price against the non-party company; and (v) the non-party company was established for a long time after filing a lawsuit against the non-party company for compulsory execution against the plaintiff company; and (v) the non-party company did not interfere with the plaintiff company. 20.

arrow