Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments to Chapter 5, Chapter 9, the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In addition, the Plaintiff asserts that the functional disorder caused by the deceased’s left-down cirrosis falls under the degree equivalent to class 6-8120 of the attached Table 3 of Article 14(3) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State pursuant to Article 14(4) of the Enforcement Decree of the same
Article 6-4 (1) of the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State provides that "The degree of disability shall be determined according to the degree of disability of the person in question, divided into Grade 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7." Article 14 (3) 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act provides that "in relation to a bridge and a sloping disability, a person who has a trouble in walking due to paralysis damage or damage to the bones of a sloping body or to damage to the bones of a sloping body (Grade 6 (2) 8120), a person who has a trouble in the function degree of a sloping among the three sections of a single bridge (Grade 6 (2) 8121), a person who has a disability rating of 1 sloping road among the three sections of sections 3 of the same Act shall be determined according to the degree of disability of the said Table" and Article 14 (3) 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act provides that "the physical disability rating of the said Table shall be determined in accordance with the degree of the same Table 4."
However, given that there is no content about the mouth damage or the bones damage to the decedent’s bed, the “satise-in cat-out cat-out cat-out cat-out cat-out cat-out cat-out cat-out cat-out cat