logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.19 2016가단22223
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

. The defendant's seal is not affixed to the contract.

7) The Defendant closed down the instant building on April 5, 2016 and delivered the instant building to B on the same day. (C) In light of the above-mentioned facts, particularly the rent of KRW 2 million paid at the time of the conclusion of the instant lease agreement, which is the same as that of the first contract, and the amount of KRW 2 million per month on the third contract newly prepared by B at the end of the Defendant’s interference with his member’s affairs. On the other hand, the amount indicated as the rent of KRW 4 million after March 3, 2016 is much less than KRW 8 million on the second contract, KRW 4 million, KRW 600,000,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 208,000, KRW 406,000,000, KRW 164,000,000,0000, KRW 268,000,000,000,000.

Even if we combine this, the overdue rent is only 15,174,194 won.

If the lease deposit is deducted from five million won, the rent in arrears shall be extinguished in all.

Therefore, the defendant is not obligated to pay 6.8 million won of the unpaid rent for the four-month period that the plaintiff acquired.

4. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow