logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.29 2017가단20796
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiff shall execute the law firm's 21st century general law office certificate, No. 3878.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. We examine, ex officio, the dismissal part of the lawsuit in this case as to whether the execution part of the procedure for cancellation and waiver of collection is legitimate.

Inasmuch as a lawsuit of demurrer is sought to exclude enforcement force of enforcement title, it is inappropriate to seek a denial of an individual enforcement act already executed (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 71Da1008, Dec. 28, 1971). In a case where a lawsuit of demurrer is finalized, the Plaintiff can seek revocation of enforcement disposition already made by submitting the original copy of the final and conclusive judgment to the enforcement agency, and can not seek performance of the procedures for application, such as cancellation of seizure of claims, waiver of collection, etc. separately against the Defendant.

Therefore, this part of the lawsuit by the plaintiff is dismissed as it is unlawful because there is no benefit of lawsuit.

arrow