beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence No. 4, the fact that the plaintiff was faced with an accident (hereinafter "the accident in this case") that the plaintiff was faced with the front wheels of the plaintiff's color flab in the parking zone while the plaintiff was bypassing in order to complete delivery in front of the D apartment E-dong, Busan Metropolitan City on October 6, 2014, and to return and operate the Ortoba in order to return the Ortoba, after completing delivery.
(The specific situation at the time of the accident is as shown in the attached Form 2). 2. Claim and judgment
A. The accident of this case alleged by the plaintiff occurred due to the negligence of the defendant who did not manage the log in the course of the apartment coloring work, and thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the following damages to the plaintiff and damages for delay after the date of the accident of this case.
1) Medical expenses KRW 4,371,00 (2) daily income KRW 23,96,320 (based on ordinary daily wage) KRW 6,260,970 (100%) (b) for total 65 days during the period of hospitalization, 17,735,350 (8%) for total 17,735,350 (8%) for 65 days from January 12, 2018 to May 25, 2027
B. Determination 1) In light of the fact that the Defendant used a log in the parking zone in the course of the apartment coloring work, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident attributable to the front wheels after the Plaintiff’s completion of delivery, and the Plaintiff merely asserted that the Defendant was at fault, i.e., the Defendant’s negligence, and did not prove any specific circumstance or circumstance that could recognize the Defendant’s negligence, it is difficult to recognize that the instant accident occurred due to the Defendant’s negligence. 2) Furthermore, the Plaintiff is asserting that the Plaintiff suffered from injury to the escape of a protruding signboard, which falls under the labor ability loss rate of 1.5% for five years from the instant accident, and that the Plaintiff sustained from the injury of the escape of a protruding signboard, which falls under the labor ability loss rate of 1.5% for five years from the instant accident, and that it was against the Mayor of the F Hospital.