Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2018Kadan4752] The Defendant is a person who operates an beauty room in the trade name of “C” in Masan-si, Ansan-si B.

Around June 7, 2018, the Defendant visited the beauty room to take photographs of the victim D, and then published the above pictures along with the title “F” managed by the Defendant on the same day.

However, the victim was not the disabled, and the defendant did not agree to the posting of the above contents in E by photographing the pictures of the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as if the victim was a disabled person.

[2019 Man-Ma629] When the Defendant operated an beauty art room with the trade name “C” in Ansan-si B, Ansan-si, and around June 2018, the Defendant arbitrarily posted the victim D’s photograph to E managed by the Defendant, thereby getting the victim to undergo an investigation at the police, and became the victim’s religion.

Defendant on September 5, 2018 or

9.6. Around June 1, 99, the phrase “D disability persons” and “D pets” was posted in the gate of the above E, and the Defendant openly insultingd the victim by setting up “H” the publicly used G yrads when making a promise with customers.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 4752]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement D in the police interrogation protocol of the accused (second time)

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A investigation report (g dialogue screen with the contents of a conversation);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Other photographs by transmitting suspect G text messages to the victim and by posting a notice on the suspect's personalE website;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of the investigation report (verification of the complainant's statement)

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel [2018 Highest 4752] published the same article as stated in its reasoning with the consent of the victim concerning criminal facts.