logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.02.15 2016고합97
현주건조물방화치상
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for three years, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are those who reside together in the F apartment 102 dong 307, the Hongnam-gun, the E-owned.

1. On October 27, 2016, Defendant A, at around 06:13, 106, and around 102:307, 102, 307, the F apartment house 102.307, Defendant A, while drinking alcohol, had a horse dispute with B, he she saw gas bags in the ward, and entered the ward as clothes, and attached a fire to the clothes in which he was discharged from his clothes with the above gas theater, and had them spread to a ceiling, wall, etc.

As a result, the Defendant, who is a E-owner used in B as a residence, destroyed the above F apartment Nos. 102 307,00 won for repair expenses to approximately 3,135,000 won, and thereby, suffered injury to the victim G (V, 64 years of age) who resides in the above F apartment, for about two weeks of treatment, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant B, as described in paragraph 1 of the above, appeared on behalf of A even though he had observed that he did not commit a fire as above.

False statements were made in order to escape A.

On October 27, 2016, around 06:50 on October 27, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the Hongsung Police Station affiliated with the Hongsung Police Station, which is investigating the fire prevention of the above fire incident, stating that “The tobacco butts in the inside shall be stored in the cipine in the cipine in the cipine, and it is apparent that there is any clerical error in the bill of the Redsung Police Station located in the Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hong-gun, Hongdong, on October 27, 2016, although the Defendant stated “U” in the bill of the indictment for the security guards around 08:27, 2016.

A false statement was made to the same purport and was arrested urgently.

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, had the above A escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant B by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement concerning E, J, K, and L;

1. Each statement prepared by G, M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, and T;

1.Each.

arrow