logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.25 2017가합571805
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 99,047,962 and its substitute for the Plaintiff shall be 5% per annum from September 28, 2017 to May 25, 2018.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff is a corporation established pursuant to the Korea Land and Housing Corporation Act to build, supply, and manage housing, and the Defendant is a local government that establishes a waterworks business headquarters and carries out the management and operation of waterworks facilities in Seoul.

On June 3, 2009, the Plaintiff was designated as the Seocho-gu Bogeumjari Housing District on 571, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul. On July 12, 2010, the Plaintiff started to build a new LH LH LH LH LWS apartment on the ground (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and completed a pre-use inspection on the said apartment on December 4, 2012. From December 21, 2012, the Plaintiff began to move into the instant apartment from December 21, 2012, and most of the households move into the instant apartment and completed the occupancy of the instant apartment around February 21, 2013.

From each of the households of the apartment of this case, at around 16:00 on July 5, 2013, the contaminated condition began until the water quality was returned to normal conditions on July 6, 2013.

(hereinafter “instant apartment water pollution accident.” On July 6, 2013, the occupants of the instant apartment were provided with water samples for collecting water quality from the Gangnam Water Business Office (hereinafter “Gangnam Water Business Office”) to which the Defendant’s waterworks headquarters belongs, and collected part of the water samples from the water tank of the instant apartment, and conducted a close inspection in accordance with the Regulations on Water Quality Standards, Inspection, etc. of Drinking Water through the Korea Chemical Convergence Research Institute. As a result, the occupants of the instant apartment exceeded the standard value in 10 items, such as lead and chromane.

On August 29, 2013, 324 of the apartment residents of this case filed a request for a public interest audit on the ground that the Plaintiff and the Defendant neglected to drinking tap water contaminated by the Defendant, and the Board of Audit and Inspection shall pay attention to the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff shall not make a joint inspection prior to the pre-use inspection or neglect to maintain and manage the waterworks facilities.

arrow